A brave new world tv show series#

Brave New World ending explained - what's in the box? However, it definitely opens up territory for a season two, though such a thing has yet to be confirmed. Indra was a new element added to the plot especially for the remake, and ironically that story is probably one of the show's weakest points, as it's unnecessarily convoluted. We then cut to Lenina, far away, surveying a green and modern landscape – which doesn't look like New London – she looks outwards before smiling. However, it's soon revealed he's not actually with her, as he's using a 'Sprite', a piece of technology projecting Lenina, and he's living alone in a run-down city, perhaps beneath New London. Mustafa warns Indra is still out there, like a lost and angry hurt child, and warns she could do bad things.įinally, we see John living a seemingly idyllic life with Lenina, similar to the one he described when they first got together. The point comes through so often and completely that one starts to wonder if it’s much of a point at all - and, but for little extant bits from Huxley’s work, like Lenina’s name, there’s no meaningful explication of New London’s politics beyond what they look like as lived by its version of the one percent.Lenina Crowne is seen speaking with Mustafa, presumably being offered the role as the new Director of Stability, or something similar, as she asks 'Why me?' and Mustafa tells her because she's 'different'. The rest of the show, though, commits these sins, staging, for instance, endless orgy scenes in order to communicate, again and again, that the citizens of New London live lives absent any virtue but gratification. The Savage Lands’ stage plays make a point about the manner in which propaganda is communicated to the gullible, depicting disengaged performers running through a rote script they don’t themselves believe. To wit: The theme-park-like zone of degradation features living exhibitions of all the vices New London had left behind, with staged superstore stampedes standing in for the greed and privation of the old way. Brown Findlay has the problem of her character’s personality having been largely squashed by her surroundings, but Ehrenreich - playing a character raised in the wilds by a troubled, secretive mother (Demi Moore) has no such excuse, but perhaps that the outsidedness of the Savage Lands might dwarf all but the most dialed-in of performers. It’s intended to provide simple titillation and reinforcement of New London’s core values, but Lenina encounters not merely a roguish stranger ( Alden Ehrenreich) but also a rebellion that challenges her perceptions.īoth Brown Findlay and Ehrenreich (of movies including “Solo” and “Hail, Caesar!”) seem frustratingly tamped-down here. With a member of her cohort (Harry Lloyd), Lenina travels to the “Savage Lands,” a region of Earth that hasn’t been groomed and remade along New London’s utopian lines. Those sometimes flicker from Jessica Brown Findlay, the “Downton Abbey” actress here playing Lenina, a citizen of the show’s futuristic uber-city of New London who feels some doubt about the life she’s been assigned.

A brave new world tv show series#

It also stacks the deck: So many of the characters we meet in this series are not merely loathsome but have so completely had the character trained out of them through a lifetime of sloth that we grab onto what little signs of life are there elsewhere. It’s a bit rich to be expected, as a viewer, to form a critique of the idle characters onscreen while sinking into hour four of a binge.

This everything-is-free ethos hides a deep repression: The wealthy spend their lives doing nothing in order that they may stay in line.Īll of which makes it an uneasy fit for a streaming-TV adaptation - premiering with the July 15 launch of NBCUniversal’s new service Peacock - from the very start.

“ Brave New World,” a TV adaptation of the Aldous Huxley novel, takes place in a fictional universe in which pleasure and indolence are the paramount virtues individuals in the upper echelon of society (served by those bred to be beneath them) spend their existences in a pursuit of leisure one might call single-minded if we suspected any of these poor creatures had much to call a mind at all.